, 2015; Cardoso and you may Souza, 2016; Santiago and you will Saliba, 2016; dos Santos and you will Jalalzai, 2021). Within performs we’ll work at misogyny as recognized by all of our interviewees in the context of Rousseff’s six decades within the fuel, particularly centering on the connection anywhere between misogynistic backlash and the gendered twice join character understood. From the after the section you can expect a far more nuanced definition getting each of the subcategories understood (come across Dining table 2), taking sit-by yourself meanings and you will examples from the research in addition to detailed analyses away from secret times in Rousseff’s presidency that exemplify the newest dynamic anywhere between all of our nuanced proposition to have checking out the newest gendered twice bind, misogynist backlash, as well as consequence to your Rousseff’s presidency.

New five subcategories identified appeared in the info in the differing levels (see Tables step three, 4). One or two themes appeared in large ratio: Review in order to Guys and Misogynyments inspired as evaluation so you’re able to men seemed for the nearly 50 % of all interview and illustrated 36 % from the statements codifiedments themed while the misogyny was indeed the majority comments (38 per cent) and you may starred in forty-two % of all the interview. To put it differently, interviewees was very aware of Rousseff’s role just like the chairman compared to other men political figures and you can previous presidents, plus the suggests Rousseff was penalized throughout their particular government because of gendered expectation and you can backlash.

Whenever you are appearing having quicker regularity throughout the interview, another two themes offer extremely important perspective to help you expertise you are able to sexist backlash during the presidency regarding Brazil’s earliest lady president. Conversations about Rousseff made an effort to follow gendered expectations ascribed so you’re able to female (Conforming into Twice Bind) starred in over 10% of comment coded and you will interviews presented. Meanwhile, discussion about precisely how Rousseff challenged the fresh new gendered expectations of her condition (Problematic the latest Double Bind) appeared in more one fifth of the many interview, constituting 16 percent of the many statements coded.

The new malfunction of the numerical occurrence of thematic studies brings a starting point so you can an excellent qualitative research of each theme, focusing on the relationship between per theme, particularly the commitment amongst the three layouts individually pertaining to the fresh new gendered twice bind (research, conforming, and tricky) and the misogynistic backlash you to definitely then followed.

Analysis to help you dudes

Among subcategories identified try reviews regarding Dilma Rousseff in order to guys, each other evaluating Rousseff to help you male political leaders and you may detailing how one thing will be various other when the Rousseff have been a guy. Therefore, we learned that there was both a conceptual part and you will important component to their particular review in order to guys. When you look at the an abstract feel, we often saw the word, “when the she was indeed men” to explain exactly how a posture could have starred out differently had Dilma perhaps not been a female. The latest story illustrated within interview is actually out-of a system one “favors guys” (Respondent 88, ), which have “zero unlock gender discrimination, however the fact that [a beneficial politician] try a guy is actually a bonus” (Respondent 8, ). When sharing that it review a great deal more concretely, there clearly was a focus on Rousseff’s rough personality, the “tough lady up to sensitive guys.” The fresh new estimate less than will bring more framework:

Discussions in the Rousseff’s impeachment plus the sexism and you may misogyny at the rear of the fresh procedure was chatted about into the popular mass media (Hao, 2016; Hertzman, 2016; Romero and Kaiser, 2016) and in scholarly really works (Zdebskyi ainsi que al

Sure, plus they said that she try a difficult person, one to she could not talk to some one, one to she had an authoritarian technique for speaking. Exactly what for men appears as a praise “zero, he or she is a hard people, a home-pretty sure person who knows what the guy wants european brud.” To their own is demonstrated as bad “zero, she cannot understand how to chat, this woman is tough, she is which” from inside the a bad ways. The way they correspond with you, feminine. I’ve attained a certain status, we have been becoming severe, we are deviating of in order to how to be a lady, who is sweet, clear, silent and you can instance. The form of Dilma getting ‘s the version of women who be able to getting solid in this a completely patriarchal world, against so it acquisition that is obtainable (Respondent 79, ).